From the Archives
Here is where I spend too much of my time: City of Toronto: Search the Archives. You should spend too much of your time there, too.
Here's a depressing before-and-after to top off your Monday evening:
The Gooderham/Flatiron Building in its proper context, with a dense wedge of city behind it and an array of Confederation-era buildings on both sides of Front/Wellington. See under the cut for some "after" shots from the 1960s.
The role of Yonge & Dundas Square
Listen.
I'm not pointing this out to confirm a widespread belief that I can find something to be negative about regardless of the circumstances. Amidst all the hooping and hollering of this evening's revelry downtown, however, I noticed an interesting phenomenon and felt I should at least bumble through a word or two about it.
This is Yonge-Dundas Square, a plaza opened in downtown Toronto back in late 2002. It is a public-private partnership, and exists largely due to the efforts of outgoing city councillor Kyle Rae. The square was intended to be the city's new central meeting place; its Times Square; its Piccadilly Circus. Yes, I'm ripping this word-for-word from the Wikipedia page. I'm le tired.
This photo was also taken during what will probably be remembered as the largest impromptu gathering of people on Yonge Street in decades: the celebration of Canada's gold medal in Men's Hockey, and a more general celebration of our Olympic successes.
Notice anything strange about the crowd? About where they chose to celebrate? The Square is dark, barren, unused and ignored, while tens of thousands of people dance and sing in the middle of the street.
There are good reasons for this, and you'll find many of them made clear either directly or incidentally in this book.
I'm not sure if Jane Jacobs ever commented publicly on Y-D Square and the "revitalization" of Yonge Street, but I have a feeling she could have predicted the phenomenon I photographed above. A city's streets are its veins, and its life, and the confluence of a city's most important and most travelled routes becomes the very heart of a city: more so than its financial district, and more so than its shopping strips. This is not, however, an effect that can be manufactured (and as I say this, thousands of SimCity players around the globe grimly nod in unison), and Y-D Square was a distinct attempt to manufacture the heart of our city.
The Square always seemed to me like a really crass attempt at selling a bit of ad space: an exploitation of Yonge Street's role as the heart of our city. Some of the events organized there over the past eight years bear this out, while others seem like genuinely interesting and positive uses of the space (though, probably not surprisingly, much of the latter has been organized not by city staff but by the populace itself: see Newmindspace, et al). This is probably consistent with the idea of a public/private partnership, and I suppose as long as the private sector plays a role in defining our public spaces there will always be events whose primary purpose is to provide a large number of eyeballs in one place.
Any and all cynicism aside, I still find it interesting that when a party of this magnitude occurs -- the celebration of the century so far, easily besting the impromptu party after the Leafs' second-round playoff victory in 2002 -- the square that was built specifically to contain it is left empty. Somewhere out there, a Toronto city planner is still misunderstanding how cities work. And if Jane Jacobs could witness this, I feel she wouldn't be surprised at all.
Where do they all come from
I'm a taciturn son of a bitch and won't go into the details of the phenomenon (increasingly mainstream coverage: 1, 2, 3), but someone left a comment in an early blog entry about Chatroulette suggesting an 'ilarious combination of a user slideshow and the Beatles' "Eleanor Rigby", and while that might be too needlessly cruel even for me I will happily present a small collection of screenshots taken over the past couple weeks accompanied by whatever you happen to be listening to at the moment. As long as it's not anything off Revolver.
Under the cut, and generally SFW...
Sitting on top of the world
On my lunch break today, I took a quick trip to the corner of Wellington and Simcoe to explore the new RBC Dexia building (pictured right). My, er, feelings toward the building aside, I had heard the top floors were still unoccupied and easy to explore and I had been looking forward to visiting it for weeks. So, today, I had an excellent view whilst I sat cross-legged and ate my sandwich:
This is the corner of Front and University
There's more under the cut, if'n y'like...
I <3 transit & infrastructure & photos
Hello!
I've wanted to have one of my better Diana shots blown up for some time now, but huge. And I didn't want a digital enlargement either -- I could do that -- I wanted light to pass through my negative at varying degrees of intensity and fall on light-sensitive paper, to put it most literally. And I wanted the Tri-X grain to be the size of breakfast cereal. This kind of thing is much harder to find these days than you'd expect, though a chat with my photog uncle has led me to Silvano Imaging, a place that takes great pride in its old-school photo lab. Let's see if they'll follow me down the treacherous rabbit-hole of insanely blurry and chunky photo enlargements without insisting that I'm crazy and don't know what I'm asking for and that the results won't please me and would-I-please-pay-in-advance-kthxbye.
I'm having troubles deciding between the following two photos, though. I can already guess which would look better on a living room wall, but my favourite is the other one, the more striking one. Any input would be great.
My Dundas St East photo is probably in the running, too, but I was leaning towards one of the monochrome shots. Thoughts?
Two new cameras (sort of?)
Hi!
Work is stressful and sleep is hard to find, but I have two new cameras to play with. The first was given to me by my boss's boss, who found he hadn't touched it in twenty or more years and figured I might have some fun with it. It's a Canon T70:
As you can see, it's one of the most special looking cameras Canon has made. As the Camerapedia link above mentions, it won design awards in 1984, which is not a good thing. However, it has good glass, a self-timer and an auto-winder so I imagine I'll have plenty of fun with it. It's also my first 35mm in 8 or 9 years, meaning I can finally use up all the expired film that has been collecting and that I have been carrying around from apartment to apartment over the past decade. I'm going to try to catch the first snowfall on it. Or, rather, with it.
I found Camera #2 at Value Village while looking for an awful Christmas sweater. It's a Kodak disposable, w/ flash:
This camera is not remarkable in any way, except in one way: the film is half exposed. Some curious person took 15-20 photos with this thing before giving it to Value Village for some curiouser person to find. Is it full of vacation photos? Is it part of an Urban Prankster project? Is it simply broken? Is it, well, incriminating? I suppose I'll find out. The folks at West Camera are patient and understanding, and I'm confident I can explain to them the circumstances surrounding this camera and why I must have it developed and that I'm only truly responsible for exposures twenty through thirty-six. As long as cops aren't surrounding the place when I go to pick up the scans I'll post the results on Flickr. I'll also give some sort of special Christmas present to anyone with a guess that's even vaguely correct.
That's all.
Past and future
I messed up a bit. So much time has passed since my New York trip that I feel odd finishing up my trip report, and now that I have another trip on the horizon I'm even less likely to finish the story. I'll try to anyway, of course. The trip was far too affecting and life-altering in all the best ways to not provide at least vague sketches of my days there, and now that I've uploaded most of my photos I'll just let the pictures guide the narrative which, for me, is a helpful crutch.
I'll also talk about trip #2 in the next post. Yes... when given another week off so soon after the previous one, I do choose to return to New York. I don't see a problem here. The difference, though, is I'm taking the scenic route, so to speak, and I'm driving myself.
More to come.







